Back to 2012 Town Warrant

 

Back to Amendment #10

 

 

 

Workforce Housing

 

by Jonathan Sycamore & Margaret Crisler, Planning Board Members

 

This article has been submitted at the Request of the Windham Planning Board in an effort to educate the public on the zoning ordinance amendments that are being recommended by the for 2012 Town Meeting.  This is the third in a series of articles published each week leading up to Town Meeting on March 13th

 

Risks to Windham if it has no WFH Ordinance

 

Yet again, the Windham Planning Board has worked diligently to compose a Workforce Housing Ordinance which will meet the Town’s legal obligations to allow greater opportunity for moderate priced housing to be built.  If we do not pass this ordinance, developers can go to the courts to obtain permission to build, without being compelled to comply with Windham’s regulations, and with no say by abutters, or concerned citizens.  Without this ordinance, even the Planning Board, ZBA, and other Town officials could be denied an opportunity to participate.  

 

Without this ordinance, projects utilizing the workforce housing statute could be built with MANY full price housing units crammed on a parcel barely big enough for one home (by our current zoning), with just a token few actual workforce units. 

 

The ordinance being put forward by the Planning Board has been carefully crafted; through a lot of research into what other Towns have done, through consultation with legal advisors, and ALWAYS keeping in mind the spirit and intent of our existing zoning ordinances.  This ordinance provides serious developers with opportunities to build quality housing but does NOT allow rampant overbuilding which would negatively impact our housing values.

 

Interestingly enough, the type of housing actually required by statute and specified in the proposed ordinance, is NOT low cost, “affordable” housing for those on welfare, or unemployed, or working for wages below the poverty line.  Instead, it is housing for families who can qualify for a mortgage to buy a house for $260,000, but whose income is not above the median.  In other words, it is housing for our children when they are starting out, our teachers and other public employees, business owners/entrepreneurs who (hopefully!) will start businesses in Town. 

 

 

The Planning Board NEEDS this ordinance to have a say in WHAT is built in Town, WHERE it is built, to LISTEN to citizens’ testimony, and impose appropriate conditions on construction.  We urge you to vote YES on Amendment #10 of the proposed Zoning Amendments.

 

Margaret Crisler

Jonathan Sycamore